Video Bar

Loading...

Follow by Email

Welcome!

Welcome! My hope is that I can help you navigate through the sea of health care information and make an informed choice by providing sound information in the full context. I look forward to hearing from you. Please click on the link for request for consultation with a care manager www.southerncrossmediation.com

11.7.11

Government cannot fix healthcare

This article by Mike Hassinger helps to highlight the unbashed ignorance of this administrations inability to appropriately address access to healthcare. Their lack of understanding in staggering and their quickness to mandate through powerplay without due consideration of the unintended consequences again highlights how the personal grab for political power is at the heart of these so called reforms.
The only hope is that states and other private for profit and non-profits work together to create cross lines co-ops that are market driven and use technology, performance based pay models that are really new healthcare models. Do we really believe that government with all it's success with Medicare can reform. To that they would have to start with themselves and I don't see that happening anytime soon.





Medicaid Math and Naked Numbers

July 11, 2011 10:06 am

by Mike Hassinger · 10 comments

Can someone help a liberal arts major out? My math skills are not the best. I can’t count to 21 unless I’m naked, so please, feel free to check these numbers. You can even use decimal points if you’d like. The AJC reports this morning that “In fiscal year 2011, [Georgia] paid roughly $1.7 billion for Medicaid and PeachCare…” and in the same article, “Medicaid and PeachCare for Kids currently provide health care to roughly 1.7 million low-income Georgians.

So, $1.7 billion divided 1.7 million people is what, $1,000 per low-income person, right? And the feds kick in about $5 billion more, which is, umm, $2,900 or so for each low-income person, right? Let’s call it $4,000 per poor person. (When counting naked, you should always round up.)

Now let’s add 600,000 more poor people when Obamacare expands Medicaid eligibility to people under 65 who earn $30,000 per year. (That’s about 133% of the poverty level for a family of four.)

“…officials say the 600,000-plus people expected to join [Medicaid] under the federal health care overhaul starting in 2014 could cost the state an additional $2.1 billion by the end of this decade.”

So these 600,000 soon-to-be-eligible low-income people will cost Georgia taxpayers 3.5 times as much as the currently eligible 1.7 million low-income people are costing Georgia taxpayers now? Let me put my shoes back on.

Medicaid is currently $180 million short, and as State Sen. Renee Unterman notes: “We can’t afford who we have on Medicaid right now.

Even a non-math major can see that the cost curve is being bent in the wrong direction. I thought the intent of Obamacare was to make quality healthcare affordable and accessible for everyone. That noble goal brings to mind the sign in auto repair shop that read: “Our service- Good. Fast. Cheap. Pick any two.” That’s the reality with healthcare. You can give it to everyone, or make it the best in the world, or make it cheaper. Pick one.








"Changing the Climate of Healthcare"www.southerncrossmediation.com

29.4.11

The power of the healthcare consumer

The power to decide.....That's what it comes down to. Who has the power? The consumer. How does that effect personal health outcomes? Here is an excerpt from the Georgia Public Policy Foundation to highlight the power of the consumer.
- National health care: The Heartland Institute's Benjamin Domenech defends consumer-driven health care in a letter to Paul Krugman: "The United Kingdom, under CMS director Donald Berwick's beloved National Health Service (he openly confesses 'I am a romantic about the NHS') in which consumer power is extremely limited by law, has created a cancer mortality rate more than 38 percent higher than America's. For example, according to Lancet Oncology's CONCORD study, in the U.K., women with breast cancer have a 46 percent mortality rate, compared with only 25 percent in the U.S., and while only 19 percent of men in the U.S. who get prostate cancer die of it, in the U.K. it kills 57 percent." Read the entire letter here: http://tinyurl.com/3bhky8e.
So let's break this down into bite size pieces.
The US Breast Cancer mortality in our mother's, sisters and friends remains at a high 25% across the board so of 100 women with breast cancer 25 of them will die here in the US. In the UK the mortality rate of our mothers, sisters and friends across the pond is a staggering 46%. So of 100 women diagnosed with breast cancer 46 of them will die. That is just short of 1/2 and that is a 100% increase over the US statistical death rate.  The men in the US who are diagnosed with prostrate cancer one of the most treatable and slow progressing cancers has a death rate of 19% or 19 out of 100. The UK death rate is again a staggering 57%. or 200% greater than the United States. These statistics alone bear the burden of proof as to why nationalized health care is not only just a bad Idea but bad for your health. Obama Care provides the fundamental structure that strips the consumer of the very decision making power that makes our health care system the most sought after in the world.
I believe the position of the liberal base is founded on the premise that ALL should have access to healthcare regardless of ability to pay and I, as a compassionate conservative, agree whole heartedly. The downfall of the liberal base is the expectation that Government is the only answer and they are seemingly unwilling to entertain other market options for a shared governance. Why not ONLY government.. you ask even in after reading the above excerpt? Let me explain.
First, the inherent power that our free market grant's is wretched away from the consumer base and it affects the "haves" and the "have nots" equally by altering our ability to choose what will and won't happen to our person.  My statement goes directly to the heart of the liberal platitude that the single corpus of power is money and that the most valued applied freedom is using that money to leverage and attain services.  Though this privilege is an aspect of a strong and free society it is not it's pinnacle. Liberalism's obsession with other people's money is at fanatical levels and is really a reflection of the self aggrandizing role as the long awaited progressive messiah.
The personal choice exercised with free will is the single most powerful tool a person can wield on their own behalf.  There are huge implications for all in abdicating our free will in trade for what is being put forward as a better social engineering for society. Such as accountability. With the government making resource choices and healthcare policy that limits an individuals ability to choose how does that meet the goal of better social engineering?  The liberal base chooses to lay down this right under the guise of self sacrifice and in the name of giving this as gift of free will to those that they see as not having the ability to do that for themselves giving them a personal sense of moral superiority and a god like feeling. And they wield it powerfully...not rightly but powerfully.
Second, and the most significant, with abdication is that the government becomes stronger, bigger and more powerful than the people it serves creating the exact power imbalance the liberal base despises between the private industry and consumer base. This is the more disturbing spin on the part of the liberal base that by some magical transformation (aka self aggrandizement) BIG government is truly different than the evil private corporations that just want to keep or steal our money at any cost and enslave their non-unionized workers.  Clearly because government is run by hallowed saints rather than the greedy private industry sinners. The really big revelation here is that there is no difference. As this administration is empowered by a minority self-aggrandized leadership to collect power by taking over private markets, using it's influence in a chilling unprecedented move to affect markets and economies for it's own political survival and intervene in our personal healthcare it is heralded as altruistic by the liberal base because it serves to affirm a personal theology regardless of wishes of the majority. There is the power imbalance.  Not only do they negate the dialogue of the other group but they are unfairly punitive and outright hostile. This is the evidence that power is used in equally corrupt ways wether private or government to secure one's power base.
The gift and responsibility of free will creates the implicit demand that we first be responsible for our own health and wellness and second keep our leadership accountable to us since we are who they serve and committ to learning how to develop further what has proven to work through consumer driven healthcare. That means creating the ability to purchase insurance across state lines, improvement in claim management, reworking medicare reimbursement and stop paying top dollar for the most invasive of treatments and increase health and wellness reimbursement and granting Nurse Practitioners equal reimbursement in primary care and finally get the state's too grant independent practice to Nurse Practitioner's which would create immediate access across class lines throughout the country.
Who had the power? The consumer. Who is making a grab for the power? The government.... Don't abdicate your free will at the empty promises of a few who have self-selected to exempt themselves from what they are trying to sell you as the best they can offer. For them It really isn't about you....it's always about them.

27.4.11

The Coming Age of the Patient Navigator

The Coming Age of the Patient Navigator

This article though timely in bringing this role into the limelight simply highlights the role of the professional care manager. As health care has become increasingly siloed in response to reimbursement, regulation and an aging population gaps in the process have repeatedly been cited as causes for readmissions and poor treatment implementation at home. Most times this is due to lack of education, coaching, and realistic expectations. Care management services begin implemented from healthcare delivery organizations such as doctor's offices are the key to integrating wellness care, illness treatment and reducing readmissions and poor therapeutic compliance. The components that are all working together to decrease risk and increase wellness are complex. A basic knowledge of the health care continuum is needed, along with the ability to educate on health and wellness topics with a high degree of proficiency, the ability to facilitate difficult dialogue without judgement or imposing your personal sense of right and wrong, the ability to anticipate needs physical and emotional and identify appropriate resources and support services that are beyond our scope.

An area of specialty is in Palliative Care. This role is an advanced role and is integrated with skills of dialogue, listening and in helping others find their narrative of life and death and discerning the values they most cherish in making end of life decisions. This is could be considered at the level of Ethical consultation which requires a significant knowledge base as well as skilled facilitation for a multiple party dialogue on the implications of decisions and what is there meaning on an individual, family and societal level. Very rewarding role and very relationship based role. These are the most rewarding. To empower and individual and a family to work through to a peaceful and dignified death excerciing free will all the way to the last breath.


"Changing the Climate of Healthcare"www.southerncrossmediation.com

25.4.11

Alzheimer's New Guidelines: New York Times Repost

Guidelines Allow Earlier Definition of Alzheimer’s

For the first time in 27 years, the definition of Alzheimer’s disease is being recast in new medical guidelines that reflect fast-mounting evidence that it begins ravaging the brain years before the symptoms of dementia.

Related

Readers' Comments

"The mental anguish of living with a diagnosis would most certainly be as debilitating as the disease itself; especially if it was wrong. Sometimes, ignorance is bliss."
susan w., central Idaho

The guidelines, to be issued Tuesday by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association, divide the disease into three stages: a phase when dementia has developed, a middle phase in which mild problems emerge but daily functions can still be performed, and the most recently discovered phase, in which no symptoms are evident but changes are brewing in the brain.

“We’re redefining Alzheimer’s disease and looking at this in a different way than had ever been done,” said Creighton Phelps, director of the National Institute on Aging’s Alzheimer’s Disease Centers Program. “I think we’re going to start to identify it earlier and earlier.”

The drive to diagnose Alzheimer’s before it has progressed into profound dementia is also reflected in a bill introduced in Congress this month, which would create specific Medicarecost codes for Alzheimer’s diagnosis, including steps involving discussions between the patient’s doctor and caregivers, a recognition that keeping family members well-informed can result in better planning and care.

“Early diagnosis is really the key to this,” said Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts and a sponsor of the bill. “Oftentimes family members notice the symptoms in their loved ones, but it’s only years later that they get diagnosed or understand what resources are available.”

The most striking addition to the guidelines concerns methods that assess brain changes involved in Alzheimer’s, including brain scans and tests of cerebral spinal fluid. Such methods measure what are called biomarkers, physiological indicators that someone is likely to develop dementia eventually, just as cholesterol and blood pressure are biomarkers of impending heart disease.

For now, the guidelines specify that Alzheimer’s biomarkers — including abnormal levels of the proteins amyloid and tau, and shrinkage of certain brain areas — should not yet be put into widespread use, but used only with patients enrolled in clinical trials.

That is because scientists cannot yet standardize the results of the tests, or know “what measure is truly abnormal and what measure is not,” said Marilyn Albert, director of theJohns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and a leader of one working group that developed the new guidelines.

As many as a third of people with amyloid plaques in their brains, for example, have not developed Alzheimer’s symptoms by the time they die. The guidelines also urge caution because there is currently no drug known to halt or significantly delay the onset of symptoms, so people told they are likely to get Alzheimer’s have no effective medication to take.

“We don’t have enough information about what to tell people,” said Dr. Steven DeKosky, dean of the University of Virginia medical school, who participated in one of the working groups. “Until you can tell a clinician, ‘If you do this test you have X amount of reliability and to do that will make a difference in the life of your patient’ — until then, it remains in the lab.”

But the guidelines reflect a sense in the medical community that the moment when science will have more specific knowledge about biomarkers is not that far off. They are intended to encourage more research so that drugs can be developed to attack early brain changes and to identify people who might benefit from such drugs when they become available.

The goal, said William Thies, chief medical and scientific officer for the Alzheimer’s Association, is “extending the range of our ability to investigate this disease and eventually find the treatment that is going to be so necessary to avoid the epidemic of Alzheimer’s disease that we see facing us over the next 40 years.”

In the short term, the biggest impact is likely to be seen with people who fall into the middle phase, those with mild cognitive impairment linked to Alzheimer’s. Experts say there are at least as many people experiencing this phase as the 5.4 million people estimated to have Alzheimer’s dementia. And they expect others to now ask their doctors if they are showing signs of mild impairment, which include experiencing some difficulty or inefficiency with memory, attention or other mental faculties, while still being able to function independently.

Dr. Albert said that if patients with symptoms of mild cognitive impairment wanted to “increase the certainty” of the diagnosis by getting a brain scan or spinal fluid test, they should obtain such tests in a research trial so they have a better chance of getting accurate results.

The guidelines also clarify diagnosis criteria for people with dementia symptoms, distinguishing Alzheimer’s from other dementias, including vascular, fronto-temporal and Lewy body. And they note that the earliest symptom of Alzheimer’s dementia is not always memory loss, but could be mood changes or problems with language, spatial perception or reasoning.

Dr. Pierre Tariot, director of the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute in Phoenix, who was not involved in drafting the guidelines, called them “a step in the right direction” that he hoped would not be “misconstrued” as a sign that biomarker tests are further along than they are. He added, “The notion that Alzheimer’s disease is a continuum that has an extensive pre-symptomatic phase is a very important message to get out.”

Dr. Phelps said it would hardly be the last word from the medical community on Alzheimer’s.

“We’re not drawing a line and saying this is it,” Dr. Phelps said. “What we’re saying is this is the best of our knowledge and we’re not going to wait 27 years to revisit these again.”


11.4.11

Geriatric Care Management is about closing the Gaps especially with planning for the end of life

After a long Blogging Hiatus during which I have done a great deal of personal work in hopes of honing my work into the right places that I am called. It seems that I am called to do one thing regardless of the venue of business and that is close the gap of knowledge. That is through patient advocacy, Geriatric care management, ombudsman, medical navigation and community education too name a few. So to honor that call I am reposting an excerpt with links that is  part of my newsletter that I receive from the American Geriatrics Society.

 

"None of us likes to think about being incapacitated and unable to make our own healthcare decisions. Yet, making your healthcare wishes known is one of the most important conversations you can have with your family, friends, and healthcare providers. In particular, conversations with your doctor or other healthcare providers - known as advance care planning - can help them to guide your family or other caregivers about your wishes if you are unable to do so yourself."

The American Geriatrics Society has released a statement on the importance of advance care planning. The statement highlights why geriatrics healthcare professionals believe these are such important conversations to have with your family, friends and care providers.

The AGS Foundation for Health in Aging has the following resources for you to learn more about advance care planning: